Too Short for a Blog Post, Too Long for a Tweet 134
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2716/f271618a5b07a8b239f2a6c126778259c516af5e" alt=""
Male dominance was unquestioned, and ranks so clearly spelled out, that no one could miss the power outlined in something so simple as a seating chart. Members and nonmembers sat apart; husbands and wives were divided; men sat on one side of the room, women on the other. Prominent men occupied the first two rows of benches: the first was reserved exclusively for magistrates, the second for the families of the minister and governor, as well as wealthy merchants. The more sons a man had, the better his pew. Age, reputation, marriage, and estate were all properly calculated before a church seat was assigned.
Puritans
were obsessed with class rank. It meant security to them, and they
could not disguise the anxiety that even the thought of its
disruption—or dissolution—produced.
As
the colonies’ leading man of science, Franklin popularized the latest
theories. Of primary interest here are his efforts to apply scientific
knowledge to that most perplexing of all subjects: the creation of
classes. It was an article of faith in eighteenth-century British
thought that civilized societies usually formed out of the fundamental
human need for security to ensure survival, but the same societies were
gradually corrupted by a preoccupation with luxuries, which resulted in
decadence. The rise and fall of the Roman Empire stood behind such
theorizing; what Franklin did was to shift the focus to human biology.
Underneath all human endeavors were gut-level animal instincts—and
foremost for Franklin was the push and pull of pain and pleasure. Too
much pleasure produced a decadent society; too much pain led to tyranny
and oppression. Somewhere in between was a happy medium, a society that
channeled humanity’s better animal instincts.
Comments