I was recently debating with a friend of mine over the role of media in racial progress. I had offered her a hypothetical situation: let’s say 3% of judges in
As an Asian-American who is sensitive to the fact that there isn’t a whole lot of vocational or personality diversity of Asian-Americans in the media, I would want Asian-Americans to be disproportionately represented in roles in which they have been historically under-represented in mass media, just to give the common person a more well-rounded image of Asians in America. In contrast, as an African-American who is sensitive to the fact that blacks are significantly under-represented in positions of power in real life, my friend would prefer that there be no black judges on TV, for the existence of a fair or disproportionately high percentage of black judges on TV might give the common person the notion that there is no under-representation of black judges in real life.
Different perspectives, similar goals, differing opinions. What are your thoughts?
1 comment:
One way to tactically social-engineer the role of media influence is to equalize racial representation: 25% Caucasian, 25% African American, 25% Latino, 25% Asian, assuming that those are the 4 main racial groups; as opposed to having media (arts) simply "accurately" represent reality, which would be something like 70% Caucasian, 13% Latino, 13% African, 4% Asian.
Post a Comment