More Coronavirus Musings
Unlike many of you, I haven’t read much news or kept on top
of derivative chatter on social media.
Part of this is due to my constrained schedule and part is an
intentional effort to not get sucked down the vortex. Nevertheless, I’ve consumed enough
information to have a somewhat informed (although likely still ignorant) take
on things. And, given that I’ve tried to
exercise balance in this, that information (whether news or my friends’ take on
the news) has come from all perspectives and persuasions. From all of that, here are a few observations
I’d like to record for posterity, which I’m sure you’ll push back on some of
this and I would welcome that as we’re all flying blind and could use a little
guidance. In no particular order:
1. A contagious disease that spreads rapidly and spares no
one is literally the stuff of the scariest of horror movies. It is not hard to be utterly terrified in
times like these. It is good advice when
people say be vigilant but don’t panic. It
is not macho to say that all of this is overblown and everyone should just get
over it. (Kind of reminds you of that
older relative you have who thinks gluten sensitivities are for sissies, but multiplied
by like a billion.)
2. Containing pandemics in a globally connected world requires
a level of vigilance that will seem uncomfortably restrictive and overly
cautious. Those chafing the most from
such limitations are the ones who value mobility and despise top-down edicts. This describes much of our country and especially those of a particular political persuasion.
3. There is such a thing as too cautious. I personally don’t think that has been the
case so far, and if anything I think too many of us have been dangerously cavalier. But it is possible, in terms of the
cost-benefit analysis of weighing more exposure and more deaths versus the continued
disruption of people’s livelihood. In
both cases, vulnerable people are hurt: in the former, people who are older or immune-compromised,
and in the latter, people who lack financial resources or social safety net to
withstand prolonged economic inactivity.
4. Tracking COVID-19 deaths is to me not unlike the rage we
have towards gas prices, in which we are disproportionately sensitized because
they’re posted in big signs and we watch the dollars and cents roll by as we
stand at the pump. There is no doubt
that COVID-19 is causing an unbearable number of deaths, but a fair question to ask is:
compared to what? On net, that number
must be cut by the proportion of its victims that might have otherwise died
during this time. It is still a frighteningly
high number, but it is not the whole amount, given that many who have died (obviously not all) were already dealing with critical health issues.
5. Another factor in our fixation on this particular danger is that is simultaneously a threat to the most vulnerable among us (the elderly, those with compromised immune systems) and has claimed a large swath of victim types including the young and healthy. We who are young and healthy are doubly right to be worried, because we are not immune and because it should matter to us to protect those among us who need the most protection.
5. Another factor in our fixation on this particular danger is that is simultaneously a threat to the most vulnerable among us (the elderly, those with compromised immune systems) and has claimed a large swath of victim types including the young and healthy. We who are young and healthy are doubly right to be worried, because we are not immune and because it should matter to us to protect those among us who need the most protection.
6. Much of my social network and much of national media is concentrated
in places that are similar to Europe in terms of politics, geography, and human
density. Much of America is not like
Europe in those ways. The federal
government has an important role to play in response to a global pandemic, such
as managing international travel, conducting public health research, and conveying
leadership/assurance/togetherness that we are all aching for during this
time. But it is simultaneously appropriate
that individual governors and mayors are asserting themselves, because there is
too much diversity in America for everything to be approached with a
one-size-fits-all solution.
7. It is possible the Chinese government will have to be held to account for their failure to properly inform the rest of the world of the danger of the novel coronavirus. It is incorrect to transfer that scrutiny to the Chinese citizens, to Chinese-Americans, or to Asian-looking people. In a world of sound bites, the nuances needed to hold both of the above statements are easily lost. I fear - personally and for others who look like me - that danger will result.
8. They say that every crisis is an opportunity. Which can be interpreted in a very privileged
way, like“this crisis doesn’t affect me, but from on high I can use
it to advance my agenda or improve my position.” I choose to interpret it differently, as if
you are surprised by an imminent threat and you instinctively reached for the
most important thing to salvage in response.
What are we reaching for when the world has turned upside down? What have our leaders reached for? Have we crafted for ourselves a world that
only makes sense a certain way, and now that everything has changed we are
desperately trying to force things back the way it works for us? Are we using the moment to score political
points, safeguard our resources, elevate our social standing, or force our premises and plans on others? Or are we being mindful to help the most
needy among us, and to cheer on those who are doing the same? History will judge our leaders in this way,
and our grandchildren’s questions to us will shine a similar spotlight on our
motives and actions.
Comments