It’s Costly to be Poor
Growing up in an upper-middle-class suburban neighborhood in
California, I did not have much direct contact with poverty. I heard and absorbed negative perceptions
about poor people: that they were lazy, dangerous, and to be avoided. Even the more charitable thoughts were just
that: a form of charity, to be done on a drop-in basis, from on high, and from
a place of advantage and superiority.
One of the great things about living in a city is the
ability to interact, both shallowly and deeply, with people from all walks of
life. I regret that all too often I can
and still do cocoon myself with others like me, because my privilege affords me
this choice. But I have also made intentional choices to
counteract this impulse, and have been thoroughly blessed as a result.
When poverty is neither distant nor academic but a real
burden borne by real people who you have real relationships with, it changes
your outlook profoundly. I’m not here to
saint or artificially exalt poor people, because that too is patronizing and
elitist. But I am here to say that those
who struggle with poverty are people too, and their values and aspirations and
fears are quite similar to mine.
What is different is the buffer of comfort and resources
that my privilege allows. It’s costly to
be poor, and that costliness manifests itself in profound ways that make my
heart hurt now that I am more attuned to the human experience of poverty. Simply put, poverty is a force multiplier, in that it wreaks
devastating consequences on individuals, households, and communities, and
amplifies small setbacks into larger ones and large setbacks into catastrophic
ones.
If you are, like me, a well-to-do person living in
upper-middle-class comfort, imagine for a moment how devastating it would be to
lose a loved one as a result of violence, or bad health care, or accident. Think of how profound an effect such a
singular and isolated tragedy would have on your well-being and on your
extended family.
For those living in poverty, such occurrences are far more
common. And the multiplicity of them,
far from having a diminishing effect as you become numb to the second, the
fifth, the tenth such incident, have an exponentially devastating emotional and
financial effect. Absent the many safety
nets that we privileged folk have been able to construct for ourselves (or have
had handed to us), these life bombs generate so great a blast and leave behind so
terrible an amount of collateral damage.
If you are a well-to-do person who also happens to be a
person of faith, consider how frequent charity to the poor and empathy with the
poor is stressed in your religious tradition.
Whoever your God is cares for the poor in our midst, and cares about
what we are doing to help and connect with them.
At this point, many people turn to politics, as a forum for
reconciling our values with the policies we want our elected officials to live
out, and as a place of frustration that so little progress is being made to do
this. And that is appropriate, as some
of the ways we as a society ought to respond to the poverty amongst us is
through levers that government controls, like regulation and public investments
and social programs. It is our
obligation as individual people to hold our government, which is after all a
government “of the people,” to do right by the poor in our midst.
It is also our obligation as individual people to do what we
can outside of the mechanism of government, to help and connect with the poor
amongst us. This can take many forms,
but the ones that easily come to mind – donating to a preferred charity, or doing
a mercy ministry through church – are only as effective long-term as our
willingness to not just help the poor but also connect with the poor. For it is in that place of shared humanity,
in which your sufferings become my sufferings and your plight is felt as my
plight, that real impact can be made. It
is costly to be poor, but it doesn’t have to be, if we all are willing to
deploy whatever political capital, social capital, and personal empathy we have
to consider poverty a “we” issue that “we” should address.
Comments