Too Short for a Blog Post, Too Long for a Tweet 157
Here are two excerpts from a book I recently read, "The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World," by Niall Ferguson.
Money is not metal. It is trust inscribed.
What
went wrong in China between the 1700s and the 1970s? One argument is
that China missed out on two major macroeconomic strokes of good luck
that were indispensable to the North-West’s eighteenth-century take-off.
The first was the conquest of the Americas and particularly the
conversion of the islands of the Caribbean into sugar-producing
colonies, ‘ghost acres’ which relieved the pressure on a European
agricultural system that might otherwise have suffered from
Chinese-style diminishing returns. The second was the proximity of
coalfields to locations otherwise well suited for industrial
development. Besides cheaper calories, cheaper wood and cheaper wool and
cotton, imperial expansion brought other unintended economic benefits,
too. It encouraged the development of militarily useful technologies -
clocks, guns, lenses and navigational instruments - that turned out to
have big spin-offs for the development of industrial machinery. Many
other explanations have, needless to say, been offered for the great
East-West divergence: differences in topography, resource endowments,
culture, attitudes towards science and technology, even differences in
human evolution. Yet there remains a credible hypothesis that China’s
problems were as much financial as they were resource-based. For one
thing, the unitary character of the Empire precluded that fiscal
competition which proved such a driver of financial innovation in
Renaissance Europe and subsequently. For another, the ease with which
the Empire could finance its deficits by printing money discouraged the
emergence of European-style capital markets. Coinage, too, was more
readily available than in Europe because of China’s trade surplus with
the West. In short, the Middle Kingdom had far fewer incentives to
develop commercial bills, bonds and equities. When modern financial
institutions finally came to China in the late nineteenth century, they
came as part of the package of Western imperialism and, as we shall see,
were always vulnerable to patriotic backlashes against foreign
influence.
Comments