Too Short for a Blog Post, Too Long for a Tweet 105
Here are two excerpts from a book I just read, "Originals: How Non-Conformists Move the World," by Adam Grant:
Justifying the default system serves a soothing function. It’s an emotional painkiller: If the world is supposed to be this way, we don’t need to be dissatisfied with it. But acquiescence also robs us of the moral outrage to stand against injustice and the creative will to consider alternative ways that the world could work.
Justifying the default system serves a soothing function. It’s an emotional painkiller: If the world is supposed to be this way, we don’t need to be dissatisfied with it. But acquiescence also robs us of the moral outrage to stand against injustice and the creative will to consider alternative ways that the world could work.
The
hallmark of originality is rejecting the default and exploring whether a
better option exists. I’ve spent more than a decade studying this, and
it turns out to be far less difficult than I expected.
***
But
don’t day jobs distract us from doing our best work? Common sense
suggests that creative accomplishments can’t flourish without big
windows of time and energy, and companies can’t thrive without intensive
effort. Those assumptions overlook the central benefit of a balanced
risk portfolio: Having a sense of security in one realm gives us the
freedom to be original in another. By covering our bases financially, we
escape the pressure to publish half-baked books, sell shoddy art, or
launch untested businesses.
Comments