How I Read the Bible
Living
in Philadelphia and being an avid non-fiction reader, I can’t help but consume
history books in large quantities. They
say that if you don’t know your history you’re destined to repeat it, and
indeed whether in personal or professional settings I have seen how looking
back to the back story is essential to interpreting what is happening now and
what will happen next.
What’s
particularly great for this history lover is that there is so much history to
consume. For example, perhaps black
history, classical Rome, and famous scientists are old hat for you, but for me
they are a wide field of fascinating stories that I am enriched by digesting
because they are largely unexplored by me to date. So it’s wonderful to think there is so much
more out there to digest.
In
the course of reading history, what has been interesting to me lately is not
just learning about the history itself but learning about history is
recorded. After all, history isn’t
exactly the history itself but rather individual authors’ choices about how to
explain it to future generations. We are
connected to history not directly, but rather indirectly through the words of
historians, who are finite and have agendas and are subject to the influences
of their day.
Growing
up in America and going to very good public schools, I learned about history in
a very modern, Western, and intellectual way.
History in this form is linear, descriptive, and thematic. It has only been since my grade school days
that I have come to learn that history is messier and more fluid in other
settings, at other times, and for other peoples. Other approaches to history are no less
accurate – indeed, it is often our modern Western textbooks that gloss over
important contextual details out of a need to hew closely to a simplified and
archetypal depiction of key people and events – they are simply different, and
need to be digested accordingly.
Which
brings us to an important history book, the one I read daily if I can help it,
which is the Bible. Perhaps you don’t
believe the Bible is a history book or that it is inspired by God. Please bear with me, because I respect that
opinion although I do endeavor to want to influence you to reconsider.
But
my post today is less for you than for people who may heartily assent to my
claims about the Bible but may be discomfited by what I am about to say,
because it may seem contradictory and even heretical to their core
beliefs. Although I assure you that I am
writing not in the spirit of tearing down treasured truths but rather building
them up on stronger foundations.
Taking
the Bible literally as a historical document is a very Western impulse. Not to say that things like creation, Noah’s
ark, and Jonah in the belly of the whale are purely allegorical, with no basis
in scientific or historical reality. But
neither were they intended to be consumed as history in the same way we read
about yesterday’s stories in today’s newspapers. Rather, they were events processed by
contemporary authors – working under the guidance of God’s direction but also
subject to the influences of the day – to make a point. And, contra what we are used to with our
modern Western eyes and ears, history back in the day was untethered from our
need for precise sequencing and literal descriptions.
Do not misunderstand what I am saying. I am not suggesting that the Bible is not historically accurate, nor that historical accuracy is unimportant. I am suggesting that we acknowledge that our frame of reference for historical accuracy is based on a modern Western construct that is not the same as the construct that Biblical authors operated under when they wrote the books of the Bible under divine inspiration. Therefore, the key to absorbing the Bible is not trying to understand it from our frame of reference but rather trying to understand what its authors were intending to convey from their frame of reference.
Let me also address a little bit of a pet peeve of mine by saying that the
key to reading the Bible is not to know your point and then find verses that
support it; it is to read its words and wonder what point God and the words’
authors was trying to make. Which is why
I do not like thematic writings or sermons that start with a premise and then
pick and choose passages that line up with those themes. All too often such an approach yanks a phrase
or sentence out of context, thus rendering its truths far less powerful. Better is to approach passages more humbly,
trying to understand the circumstances being described as well as the
circumstances within which the authors are reaching into the future to convey
something in their time.
Related
to yesterday’s post about "modern-day Pharisees," I see in this country far too much deification of a
certain set of messages that purport to be from the Bible but are merely a
modern, Western, and shallow extrapolation of portions of it – and a
historically poor and out-of-context extrapolation at that. The real Bible and the real characters and
messages found in it are so potentially transformational. Yet, sadly, there is far too little good
reading of the books and chapters and verses.
I know there is far too little good reading because there is far too little
wonder and far too little uncomfortable shifting in place, and far too much false
pontificating and far too much fretting over the accuracy of literal
interpretations. This is a bad reading
of history, with grave consequences for our souls and this generation. And we are the worse for it, mind and body and
spirit and society.
Comments