Back to Work


That's a disturbing chart, no matter how you slice it. It's from a recent New York Times econ blog post just how much deeper and longer the high unemployment situation has been this go round, compared to the worst of the past 35+ years.

I'll leave it to the pundits to point fingers; not surprisingly, right-wingers blame Obama and lefties say "we inherited this mess from W." I will note that this current recession has been pretty equal-opportunity in its pain distribution, at least income level wise: blue-collar industries like manufacturing and construction have taken it on the chin, but so have high-flying financial whizzes and real estate moguls.

Is life better now than it was 35+ years ago? On the one hand, much has been made of how us Gen X'ers should be bitter because we make less, in real terms, than our parents. Our 401k's are in the tank. And we're caught in between boomers and their kids, not as experienced as one bloc and not as tech-savvy as the other.

And yet, innovation in technology and health care has vastly improved our quality of life. Automation and outsourcing may have cost some of us our jobs, but it also benefits all of us in the form of more, better, and cheaper things to buy. And, to the extent that capitalism has taken hold in places like China, India, and Brazil, hundreds of millions of consumers are entering the middle-class, just in time to prop up our creaking global economy with their purchasing power. So long as education and opportunity are available to as broad a base of people as possible, life can always get better.

Yet there are signs of worry on the horizon. Will America experience Japan's "lost generation," in which the young and unemployed are unemployed for so long that they lose skills and hope? Far too many in this country and around the world are denied access to education and opportunity; past generations had decent jobs for those who were left behind, but future generations will not. I remain astounded that women are still treated as second-class citizens in many parts of the world, particularly the Middle East; such a waste of talent and brainpower and innovation. And Copenhagen signaled to me that we're addicted to cheap energy, unwilling to face up to the geopolitical, environmental, and quality of life consequences of under-pricing our natural resources.

In short, we have our work cut out for us. Let's hope we can get people back to work.

Comments

Daniel Nairn said…
From the looks of it, the graph seems to show that we've hit rock bottom of the job losses. The optimistic take is that it's all up from here; that is unless we double-dip as stimulus measures start to be pulled away.
Eric Orozco said…
ugh...

Time to rethink things, ...test out stronger foundations. What nobody is waking up to see is that the journalists are canary in the coal mine. We should be watching how they reinvent journalism. The catchphrase opening the last decade was Stephen Johnson's popularization of the term "emergence". I think the term we need to think more about is "Convergence". How do we create and distribute value in better ways? That's a question for everybody.
LH said…
Eric, thanks for chiming in. Tell me more about what you're thinking.
LH said…
Daniel, I'm less optimistic; hence the need to think about what may need to be done structurally to adjust to the end of low natural unemployment. Consider the following:

* After the most recent recession, in 2001, it took 4 years for us to get back to pre-recession employment levels.

* I'm not sure we've experienced the worst of the recession from the standpoint of 1) states and cities, and 2) commercial real estate.

On a positive note, a lot of ARRA actually hits in 2010, so that may blunt some of the pain. Hoping for the best, but beginning to muse more about what needs to be done if recovery takes longer than expected and if we end up at a new normal that looks a lot different from what we're used to.

Popular Posts