Retail in Philadelphia


Sorry for the late notice, but at 9 o'clock this morning, my firm will be giving its final presentation at City Hall for a three-year study on retail in Philadelphia. This was my first assignment when I started this job, so there is a particular sense of personal satisfaction associated with this completion.

You'll soon be able to go to our website and download the 10-page executive summary, 700-page (!) report and appendices, and reams and reams of actual data on the 260+ commercial corridors in Philadelphia. But in the meantime, let me summarize three years of work into four points:

* A diversity of retail centers work in Philadelphia. As a group, the top-performing corridors turned out to be a nice mix of auto-oriented and transit-oriented, regional-serving and neighborhood-serving, old and new.

* There is a wide disparity in corridor performance. The top 5 percent of corridors represent a disproportionate amount of shopping trips and sales dollars, while the bottom 40 percent represent relatively little activity.

* Appearance matters. It turns out aesthetics are not just the purview of geeky designers with too-cool glasses who are detached from the real world; the most powerful interventions at the corridor level were those that gave visual signals of beauty, safety, cleanliness, and care.

* There's room for improvement re: making retail more pedestrian-accessible. Far too many transit-proximate sites were not transit-oriented, as vast seas of parking and drive-through uses announced to the world, "drive to us, don't walk to us." Meanwhile, auto-oriented corridors were particularly pedestrian-inhospitable, as evidenced by the fact that of trips of less than 1/4 mile to such places, 70 percent were by car.

Obviously, there's a lot more here, which you can hear about later this morning or read about to your heart's content from our report. We're hoping for lots of follow-on work; having spent three years exploring retail in Philadelphia, we've only scratched the surface of what we can know and what we can answer.

Comments

Daniel Nairn said…
Congratulations! That seems like a fascinating study.

"of trips of less than 1/4 mile to such places, 70 percent were by car."

wow. At some malls you may have to walk a 1/4 mile from your car across the parking lot anyway. Not exactly a pleasant walk either.
LH said…
Daniel, thank you for your kind words. Re: car trips of <1/4 mi, I think this is the more correct interpretation than "people are lazy." And you won't be surprised to learn that successful retail corridors were a more positive amenity to their surrounding neighborhood if you were talking about a mixed-use pedestrian/transit-oriented corridor ("I love the convenience of being able to walk to shops and restaurants"), but were a more negative amenity if you were talking about a big box-dominated auto-oriented corridor ("I hate having all the traffic so close to my house"). The full report and all the data are available on our website: www.econsult.com.

Popular Posts